[sllug-members]: Which Network Monitoring Solution?
Jeff Folsom
jfolsom at scl.utah.edu
Wed Nov 28 09:11:57 MST 2007
We use Groundworkopensource, www.groundworkopensource.com, which is
basically a juiced up configuration utility / monitoring suite and we
like it a great deal. You'll find that it simplifies your ability to do
tasks like you've described, as opposed to manual nagios
configuration. We also used OpenNMS for quite a while, but we had 2
problems:
1) Maintenance is time consuming, and configuration is cryptic for
incoming admins.
2) We needed network interface graphs, and the built-in support is flaky
at best, we ended up doing a parallel install of Cacti (www.cacti.net)
to get all the functionality we needed.
But, the autodiscovery of services was worth its weight in Sterling.
I've personally played with Zenoss a bit, and it is very nice, but
Zenoss clients have a habit of crashing, with little facility for
automatic restart.
Best of Luck
Jeff Folsom
Marriott Library Student Computing - University of Utah
Nathan Lane wrote:
> Hi I am trying to get a network monitoring solution. In the past
> we've attempted to use Nagios, but couldn't figure out how to get it
> to monitor whether a specific web page is accessible on a certain
> server. Today I am trying to set up an OpenNMS server to do the same
> thing, and I am still running into road blocks - I can't find a
> straight forward solution and I've been working on it for two days
> (same problem as with Nagios). I just found another one - Zenoss -
> and I'm wondering if it's any better/easier/simpler to configure, or
> if it stands up to Nagios and OpenNMS.
>
> Our platform is Ubuntu server 7.
>
> Our environment is a mostly Windows XP/Server 2003 network
>
> We want to monitor ICMP, HTTP, FTP, SNMP, and most important and
> difficult (apparently) whether or not specific websites are accessible
> constantly.
>
> Now I know that these [probably] all use slightly different models for
> monitoring - Nagios is mostly SNMP, but has other capabilities and
> it's easy to write plugins for using Perl. OpenNMS has automatic
> "discovery" of services, which we could really care less about, but it
> seems to be difficult to make it check services that aren't
> "discovered", like this website problem (discussed briefly above). I
> haven't tried Zenoss yet, I just discovered it on Sourceforge, and
> I've been lurking on their IRC channel. We currently use a commercial
> system called ipMonitor, which is very pricey, and it doesn't even do
> everything that we want (though I can't pinpoint what it was exactly
> that it doesn't do) but the configuration part of it is very self
> explanatory and straight forward.
>
> So I need some help - in two areas, which system should I use, or is
> there one the one-ups all of these, and can anybody help me configure
> it to check whether a specific web page is accessible from the server
> (following redirects automatically)?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Nathan Lane
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> See http://www.sllug.org/ for latest SLLUG news, information, links.
> Join SLLUG and other UT LUG members on irc.FreeNode.net channel #Utah
> sllug-members at sllug.org
> http://www.sllug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sllug-members
>
More information about the sllug-members
mailing list